Regional branches have no room for manoeuvre

On May 19, the President of pole job, Dominique-Jean Chertier, criticized the conditions of the merger of ANPE and the Assedic covered words. Alain Lecanu, the representative of the GSC, presiding over its evaluation Committee, draws, him, red ball against Christian Charpy. If everyone does not like him openly the departure of the Director-General, the social partners are many to call for a change in governance and to estimate would not be enough listened.

What balance are you getting the merge between ANPE and the Assedic, six months after the creation of pole job

I note that two pole employment coexist. Presiding the pole job evaluation Committee, I started a France Tower a few weeks ago. I already visited 5 regions. On the ground, I found people obviously jostled by the circumstances, that did not arrange the arrival of the RSA and the prospect of registration at the unemployment of young people who arrived at the end of school in September-October. Despite this, I found very brave and highly motivated. They adhere to the proposed merger to improve service to job-seekers. But pole employment also has another face, that of a "hypercentralisation" of decisions at the level of Headquarters.

To achieve a merger of this magnitude, is it not necessary to have a branch strong enough to impose change

The reality is that the Director General works in close with a few close circle. Regional branches have no room for manoeuvre. The ex-Assedic are placed on the key. I give you an example: is it normal that Christian Charpy Vienna quietly confirm the former head of the human resources of the NAE, supposed to be the interim, to the position of HRD of pole job, while he had said to the Board of Directors that he would recruit someone outside to replace Jean-Louis Sciberras, which I would like to know the real reasons of departure This is not the first time that the Director-General is thus the Board of Directors of pole job fait accompli. And it is even more hidden to take his orders directly from the Government. It is time to give a second wind to the merger and change of Director-General. Need us at the head of the public employment service a true pattern comes from the private sector for pole employment is not an administration as was the ANPE but a company.

Your comments are particularly virulent. Yet, it has not heard the Board of Directors to complain so far...

We considered me the first, which needed to be taken back. But six months after the merger, what I see leads me to the whistle. If not all, in any case most of the social partners share my findings.

Anyway, you were already hostile to the appointment of Christian Charpy Pôle Employment Directorate...

I would remind you that it was for me a matter of principle: I thought and still think that it was not good to appoint an ex-ANPE branch. It would have been like if he was an ex-Unedic. And six months after the creation of pole job, the system has already shown its limits.